the game is on

alhamdulillah im starting back my degree study after 3 months. 3 months holidays was spent well in my thinking n now the new semester is  back..even the study mood is still off but it should be forced to on now.

the class is working like normal but what is not normal the sudden changing environment in my life in uni. it just like something i plan to do but not crossing in my mind it will happened. i hope this will be a great experience n im really looking forward to see the result. i can imagine the people will be so shocked with this new thing but i dont know how much the degree of shockness they will have.

i kept reminded myself that this new thing is not a small matters but will become the talk of peoples. big responsiblities is coming on even its not fully on my shoulders. background is the main asset for the front.

how can i survive with this? lets their experience teach me how to do it. im only at the back n ready to serve with my little knowledges n experience. i myself feel so dwarf when become part of the circle.

    " the fire was lighted, the heat is getting hot n we need the cooler"

Betul atau Tidak?

Sejak kebelakangan ini, terutamanya dalam menempuh semester ke 2 di IIUM sebagai student jurusan Undang-undang, saya tiba-tiba dapat merasakan satu alunan ombak yang sangat kuat ditempuhi oeh mahasiswa kini. saya secara bersendiri dapat merasakan ombak yg melanda. Kawan2 sejurusan saya sendiri juga tidak terlepas menjadi antara kelibat meninggikan ombak ini.

saya pasti perkara ini sedikit sebanyak adalah pengaruh dripada AUKU seksyen 15. Pemansuhan seksyen 15 AUKU membawa satu gelombang baharu kepada golongan mahasiswa yang dahgakan kebebasan bersuara dari dahulu lagi?

Secara personalnya, saya sendiri gembira dengan pemansuhan ini.kerana akhirnya suara Mahasiswa yang sebelum ini yang saya rasakan tersekat dan juga kebebasan berpolitik terbantut dan terbatas dibuka seperti banduan dilepaskan dari penjara.

saya sebnarnya takut2 dan kurang yakin untuk menulis post ini tetapi saya punya persepsi sendiri untuk perkara ini walaupun sudah boleh di anggap lapuk. Hasil dari insiden ini, Mahasiswa telah mula mengorak langkah. Saya tidak kisah jika langkah itu adalah langkah yang bijaksana tetapi apa yang berlaku adalah kurang bijaksana sebgai pemimpin mahasiswa. kekecohan demi kekecohan berlaku tatkala kebebasan berpolitik dibenarkan. seriously this is not what we wanted it to be.

saya melihat pada msa depan jika mahasiswa2 ini menamatkan pelajaran dan menjadi ahli politik, ada dua perkara yang akan terjadi bila mana mereka menjawat jawatan tersebut. yang pertamanya, jika di peringkat universiti mereka telah bertindak agresif dan "over the limit" then the same character they will bring with them while being a politician. assumption ke2 saya adalah mungkin apabila mereka menjadi ahli poitik kelak, mereka akan melihat kebodohan mereka sewaktu menjadi mahasiswa dan bertindak membetulkan sikap menjadi seorang yang lebih baik.
mungkin apa yang saya katakan ini bukan idea yang bernas dan terbaik tapi ini saja yang dapat dikronolgi oleh minda insan kerdil.

jika perkara ke2 berlaku, maka itu adalah sesuatu yang bagus untuk masa depan tetapi buat masa sekarang mahasiswa itu patut dilabel sebgai TRANGRESSOR. untuk perkara ke2 ini juga, probability utk berlaku adalah tipis boleh saya katakan. utk perkara pertama, kalau boleh kita minta simpang la ye.

Rentetan peristiwa2 yang berlaku antaranya demonstrasi melibatkan pergaduhan, menurunkan bendera dan mengugut pemimpin sperti Datuk Saifuddin Ali untuk meletakkan jawatan, saya sedikit sebanyak nampak akan kesan dan kepentingan AUKU itu bertapak sebagai undang2 mahasiswa. Bukan niat saya untuk menyokong mana2 parti tetapi itulah jalan yang saya nampak.

walaubagaimanapun, perkara akan jadi sebaliknya jika AUKU itu terus bertapak. saya rasa pembaca sudah sedia maklum dari implikasi AUKU berdiri sebagai pak guard kepada mahasiswa. mahasiswa ROBOT akan tercipta. AM I RIGHT? it may be right may be wrong. tapi itu lah implikasinya bagi saya kerana bagi saya apa yang berlaku telah terjadi dalam politik mahasiswa membuatkan saya berfkir sebagai seorang yang dewasa dan lebih kreatif.

saya pernah terbaca idea yang mengatakan jika jalan yang sepatutnya sudah diambil tetapi pihak berkuasa besikap "buat do know" ada relevan lah kiranya cara "hardcore" diaplikasikan. itu ada betulnya jika diaplikasikan dalam konsep tindakan mahasiswa saya rasa tapi persoalan juga perlu di bangkit adakah mereka layak berbuat begitu? jika ya, teruskan.

akhir sekali, saya sendiri takut jika satu hari diangkat sebagai pemimpin mahasiswa walaupun itu adalah perkara mustahil. takut saya juga menjadi trangressor. bagi saya walau baik mna pun dasar sesebuah perjuangan, tindakan itu perlu melambangkan tindakan mahasiswa. teringat kepada satu konsep yang saya blajar dalam Islamic legal system II, jika seorang pemimpin itu fasik dimana dia layak untuk digugurkan sebgai pemimpin tapi dia sendiri tidak mahu berbuat demikian, pihakk yang melantik itu layak untuk membatalkan kuasa beliau tetapi jika tindakan membatalkan itu akan melibatkan satu bencana yang dasyat, perkara itu perlu dipertimbangkan. jika diaplikasikan di dalam konsep AUKU ini,menimbangkan antara baik dan buruk pemansuhan AUKU adalah perkara pertama perlu dilakukan sebelum membuat keputusan memansuhkan atau tidak.

* saya secara personal tidak berniat untuk membelahi mana2 parti dan lebih suka untuk berfikir di tengah2.
quoting my madam quote " dont say something u dont know otherwise that will make u look fool". jika perkara yang saya cakap dia atas adalah salah, anda layak utk memperbodohkan saya.

PUTERA WILLIAM kahwin?? ada aku kesah??

again not because im heavy on one side.....media is the one who make the mind of peoples become complicated and confusing them...pity our society...im referring to all kind of medias, government's media and opposition's media....
hey come on la! which one is true!

in related to what happened yesterday...not in England ok..that one i dont want to take part..hahhaa
but the one happened in MALAYSIA...angkat sumpah mubahalah..(laknat-menglaknati)...

in government's newspaper, they told that before the event took place, there was some arguments happened between both supporters...but what they highlighted only the arguments words made by the opposition's supporters.from the beginning of the articles until the ending, not even one sentences described the government supporter's also uttered some argument's word....to make it worst, the author include the word "bodoh" as one of the words came out from the mouth of opposition's supporter in the mosque..damn..this is too much i think..they hide their own weakness and just reveled what benefit them...what a profit for them because most malaysians only read their newspaper....

then, we turn to opposition's newspaper...what was told inside that both make some arguments and both were changing some word arguments...and also in this newspapers they told that Datuk T's supporters been asked to go out from the mosque because uttered some harsh words in the mosque....
look! there was two things different here! in the former they accused AS (anwar's supporters) doing the chaos..while in the latter they said TS (datuk T's supporters making the chaos)....im getting confused and im sure YOU are confused too right? unless u are damn too fanatic with ur party until blind ur eyes...
BETUL LA KAN CINTA ITU BUTA??hahahha.....jika benar cinta itu buta, butakan matamu....(lirik lagu) heh...

ok lets we review this two statement...one from the GN (gvrnmnt's newspaper) n one from ON (opposition's newspaper)...

1.       GN - sumpah mubahalah bermaksud saling melaknat sesiapa yang berbohong antara kedua-dua belah termausk orang yang bersumpah....muhabalh tidak tertakluk kepada banyak syarat kerana dalam nas-nas syarak tidak dinyatakan dengan jelas syarat diperlukan..ia boleh dilakukan di mahkamah atau di luar mahkamah ---(Pensyarah Jabatan Pengajian Islam Universiti Sains Malaysia(USM) dan Ahli Majlis Fatwa Perlis)..
2.       ON- sumpah di depan hakim dalam mahkamah mempunyai nilai yang tinggi mengikut perundangan islam. sumpah mesti dalam mahakamah di depan Hakim Syarie. (seperti yang dinyatakn oleh majls peguam dalam post sebelum nie under section 73 of akta keterangan mahkamah syariah) 

look two different things..but according to actual law as stated in the statute we must solve it in court right? 

so, the challenge made by Datuk T may rightfully not been accepted by Anwar..(im not supporting him)....tp itu yang sebetulnya..his right kn on the eyes of law..kenapa kecoh2 dalam masjid...go straight to the court...

n one more thing in law there is one vital maxim...."one is not guilty until proven guilty"...who will prove the guilty of the accused? the accuser..how? by bring the proof..to where? in court....thats the way...

*im only first year LLB student..it may be some mistakes there...bt im showing the real picture by the way...u can add something if u want...

MEDIA, mediA or media???

alhamdulillah the writer back to "imarah" this blog.....for writer it is not an easy job to update blog..

tonight writer hope will be the turning point to make this blog shining with some constructive and updated views about what recently occurred. 

near to one month, writer's mind is not fill with the updated and sensational issues...busied with final exams last 2 weeks maybe one of the reason. the second reason MAYBE writer is too bored with today NEWSPAPERS......

So, in this post writer is going to share some facts ( can be true / can be fake) and express some views after making some readings on articles and blogs.....

firstly, MEDIA...the channel where the public get the information about the current position of person, nations or business...the source where most of persons put their trust so much. the poor, the middle and the rich all rely on the same media as their bank of information. however, on the part of the media's handler are they release the true fact or information to the public? that is the problem that we are facing now..

yesss.... we know that the media is controlled by the one who control the federal power..of course that is the norm of the world. who in power would handle everything on their hand. but they would not get the power without the public support..BEAR THAT IN MIND...when i write like this u all may think im on the other side..NO, IM NOT...im in the middle...think like a refree in a match...what i concerned here is the public interest. when the media is controlled by them, most of the news publish are praising and showing their good deeds to the public only. they publish what they think will not tarnished their image...n also they defame and accuse their enemy through the channel on the same time.what a shame and dirty tactic for me. they on the fortunate side becoz most of the malaysian citizens can easily access to the channel. compared to their enemies, the latter is having some difficulties in accessing the newspaper written by the latter becoz it is not printed as many as the former. and also some of it may not written in paper and only can be accessed via internet. what an unfair situation! See, how much minds of peoples they can easily catch and insert their own fake vaccines? im not posting this if the easily-access-media is telling the truth.see again, what has been condemned by Tun Dr Mahathir about media. he stated that media should be honest to the public even it is bitter to tell the truth. and AGAIN u know what this kind of article or quote(this mahathir's statement) is not posted or published in Malaysian No 1, 2, 3, 4 n etc  but only in HARAKAH( im too dare to tell it hahaha)...what a shame right...u only choose somethng to share with the public to protect ur right but u hidden the facts where the public has the right.

* tp kan we should not always blame the first media bcoz sometime they are also tell the truth kn3x?? ape, contoh? contohnye mcam stu saluran tue siarkan video lucah dalam tv..terbaik kn?? why not they have a slot at night utk siaran mcm tue jgak ek..bru la john terry, ahmad sifu and mybe minah tonggek xtido malam kn??hahaha

n one more thing, about the sex scandal......ini lagi stu kes yang mg aku sendrik dah fed up nk bca n dgr news about it..until la 8.15 pm last night when i watched buletin utama...i did realised this issue is getting hot! hot n spicy gitu..haha..i like it...so cpat2 la sya buat kajian dengan membaca artikel2 berpatutan..n dah fham la skit2 situation dia...just to share with u all...Tmrrw after jumaat prayer we will have ANGKAT SUMPAH event held by DATUK T...wow..mcam angkat sumpah di rja kn..If England is hot with the wedding of their Putera William n Kate....malaysia pon da gak bnda yg hot..esok plak tue..lagi cepat..haahha..ok2xx...ckup2 la joke kn..

im now wearing a legal practitioner's spectacles k....haha

DONT MIXED UP SYARIAH LAW N CIVIL LAW.....even though dah mg mixed dah pon...

my concern is to those who dont understand well which one is civil law and which is islamic law..

that is the problm...when they dont understand, they tend to express extremely something which is not true....

first, sumpah is one of the way to defend oneself from the alleged accuse on him. however, in islam before sumpah is given, the accuser must brought first 4 witnesses to prove the alleged accuse on the accused. then, after that only in the absence of anything that can defend the accused , he can use the defence of SUMPAH...itu secara basic....nak detail find out sendrik ek....tpskrg kita gna civil law ke syariah law ek?? in this matter maybe jtuh kn dalm jursdiction of syariah court kn? btol la sbb dia kn accusing someone committing adultery...under shariah la tue...

 In our own syariah law (after having some amendment according to our own nation / state styles), we have our own implementation...as stated by majlis peguam2 syarie in harakah...to those who accuse someone must bring the proof to the court...so from here shows that the accuser bear the burden to prove beyond reasonable doubt.( section 73 akta keterangan mahkamah syariah WP).....n also stated in the same section the accused also must give some explanation to the alleged accuse....generally, both person must give explanation about the problem in court! not in mosque or other place....so why not they go to the court?? are they trying to show they are following shariah?? good if so..but why not they practice wholly and correctly in their life the shariah? 

p/s  Di dalam prinsip keterangan Islam sumpah sebenarnya terletak kepada pihak yang kena dakwa dan bukannya orang yang mendakwa selari dengan prinsip Islam iaitu ”Keterangan pada pihak yang mendakwa dan sumpah kepada pihak yang mengingkarinya.” (harakah-majlis peguam-peguam syarie)

* the thing i discussed above may not all true..some mistakes will be...bcoz im just LLB first year n first sem student....